Rhonda Schlangen talks about a paper co-written with Jim Coe. It explores the tension at the heart of advocacy, and advocacy evaluation, between wanting clear answers and the inherent uncertainties around how social and political change really happens.
Recognising this tension, they set out some ideas around planning and evaluating advocacy that accommodate the fact that social change is typically uncertain and unpredictable.
To read the paper: http://bit.ly/2uHETZ8
There are no reviews yet.